top of page

Stalls For All

University of Melbourne Student Union' campaign to improve bathroom accessibility.

Photo by Heather Broadbent.


(From The Swanston Gazette print edition one, 2019)


The 'Stalls For All' report by the University of Melbourne Student Union found that less than one per cent of bathrooms at the university met recommendations for gender neutrality and accessibility.


The report released today kicks off the ‘Stalls for All’ campaign to improve bathroom access for sex and gender diverse students.


'Stalls for all' gathers research from multiple disciplines to “demonstrate the immense harm the prevalence of gendered bathrooms cause for trans, intersex and gender diverse people”.


“Gendered bathrooms structurally act to facilitate gender regulation, and dictate how trans and gender diverse students can express themselves on campus,” it said.


“The consequence of gender nonconformity is harassment, stigmatisation, and violence.”

Implementing all-gender bathrooms on campus was suggested as a viable solution to combat this.


But the report criticised Melbourne University’s approach of converting already existing disabled bathrooms into all-gender bathrooms, saying it “communicates the idea that being trans, intersex or gender diverse is some sort of disability”.


“Creating a separate bathroom that trans, intersex and gender diverse students can use consolidates their exclusion from public space,” the report said.


The report developed key criteria for the ideal all-gender bathroom, which would contain private stalls and an all-gender lobby with sinks and mirrors. Floor-to-ceiling stalls, wheelchair accessibility, and gender-neutral signage were also included in this criteria.


Additionally, it makes multiple recommendations which would mandate accessible, all-gender bathroom lobbies in every building, and a tough stance against bigotry and abuse in bathrooms.


While only 0.8 per cent of Melbourne University’s bathrooms met these criteria, 19.6 percent of bathrooms were considered gender-neutral when re-labeled disabled bathrooms were included.


That number also accounts for “office and research spaces, which have much lower foot traffic and are less likely to have gendered bathrooms”.


Melbourne University's Southbank Campus was much more advanced, with 19.7 percent of their bathrooms being all-gender lobbies.


The writer of the report, UMSU Queer Officer Andie Moore, said it was imperative that all-gender bathrooms be built for both staff and students.


“The fact that trans people cannot access bathrooms is symbolic of the way that they’re excluded from society,” they said.


“Multi-stall bathrooms are the best option for trans people to feel safe on campus and it’s the best way to do all-gender bathrooms.”


“[Melbourne] University needs to step out of its bureaucratic bubble and start thinking about ways they can actually put pride, diversity, and inclusion into practice.”


While the report focuses on Melbourne University, Andie Moore said it would provide a key framework for other universities to improve bathroom access.


In 2017, Rochelle Kirkham reported that RMIT University had built three all-gender bathroom lobbies, and re-labelled 50 single cubicle toilets.

 
 
 

3 Comments


Guest
4 days ago

I liked how this post kept things simple and didn’t try to sound smarter than it needed to. It’s the kind of write-up you can skim, then jump back to the parts you care about without getting lost. Halfway through I clicked around https://newimage.io/ out of curiosity, and it gave me the same “clean and straightforward” feel—nothing screaming for attention, just the info laid out plainly. The examples here also felt pretty relatable, like stuff you’d actually bump into instead of made-up textbook scenarios. And honestly, good formatting matters more than people admit; when the sections are short, it’s way easier to stay focused. On the site, the headings are spaced out nicely and the layout stays tidy as you…

Like

Guest
Jun 01

KUWIN mình mới ghé thử vì thấy bạn bè nhắc hoài, vào kiểu xem nhanh giao diện thôi chứ không có ngồi nghiên cứu gì sâu. Cảm giác đầu tiên là trang nhìn thoáng, chữ nghĩa dễ đọc, bấm qua lại mấy mục cũng không bị lạc. Mình có lướt phần giải đáp thấy họ có nhắc chuyện kết quả vận hành bằng RNG chuẩn quốc tế, đọc qua thì cũng thấy yên tâm hơn chút chứ không kiểu nói chung chung. Nói chung trải nghiệm lướt ổn, không bị nhồi nhét quá nhiều thứ một lúc. Mấy khối “TIN TỨC” với “Hướng Dẫn & Giải Đáp” tách riêng rõ ràng ngay trên trang nên nhìn phát là nhận ra…

Like

Guest
May 23

https://tylekeopro.com/ dạo này thấy mọi người nhắc hoài nên mình cũng bấm vào xem thử cho biết, kiểu lướt nhẹ chứ không có ngồi đọc kỹ từng phần. Cảm giác đầu tiên là trang nhìn sáng sủa, bố cục thoáng nên không bị “ngợp” như nhiều site khác. Mình thích cái cách họ chia nội dung thành từng khối rõ ràng, kéo xuống một chút là biết mình đang ở đoạn nào, không phải đoán. Mấy mục quan trọng cũng nằm ngay trên thanh menu nên chuyển qua lại khá tiện, đỡ mất công tìm. Nói chung chỉ cần vậy là đủ để mình làm quen nhanh, vì nhìn vào là thấy các khối nội dung tách bạch và menu…

Like

© 2024 The Swanston Gazette

bottom of page